Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIFX vs ERBAX
CWIFX vs ERBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWIFX vs ERBAX
CWIFX vs ERBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIFX vs. ERBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIFX is a Hold and ERBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. ERBAX (580M). CWIFX pays higher dividends than ERBAX: CWIFX (1.46) vs ERBAX (0.71). CWIFX was incepted earlier than ERBAX: CWIFX (24 years) vs ERBAX (16 years). ERBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CWIFX (0.85). ERBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWIFX (44.00). CWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBAX: CWIFX (250) vs ERBAX (1000). CWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.02 vs. ERBAX (9.19). CWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.08 vs. ERBAX (0.39).
| CWIFX | ERBAX | CWIFX / ERBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.13 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.722 | 11.515 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 580M | 27,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.71 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.02 | 9.19 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.92 | 22.93 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.08 | 0.39 | 9,894% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.46 | 55.86 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement