Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIFX vs IGFAX
CWIFX vs IGFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWIFX vs IGFAX
CWIFX vs IGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIFX vs. IGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIFX is a Hold and IGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. IGFAX (63.1M). CWIFX pays higher dividends than IGFAX: CWIFX (1.46) vs IGFAX (0.02). CWIFX was incepted earlier than IGFAX: CWIFX (24 years) vs IGFAX (19 years). IGFAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CWIFX (0.85). CWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IGFAX (32.00). IGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWIFX: IGFAX (0) vs CWIFX (250). CWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.02 vs. IGFAX (-42.52). CWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.08 vs. IGFAX (-53.89).
| CWIFX | IGFAX | CWIFX / IGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.49 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.49 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.722 | -11.401 | -138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 63.1M | 253,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.02 | 7,060% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.02 | -42.52 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.92 | -43.79 | -123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.08 | -53.89 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.46 | -44.67 | -305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement