Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIFX vs RGGKX
CWIFX vs RGGKX Comparison
Open Charts CWIFX vs RGGKX
CWIFX vs RGGKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIFX vs. RGGKX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIFX is a Buy and RGGKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGGKX (1.99B). CWIFX pays higher dividends than RGGKX: CWIFX (1.46) vs RGGKX (0.36). CWIFX was incepted earlier than RGGKX: CWIFX (24 years) vs RGGKX (15 years). RGGKX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CWIFX (0.85). CWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGGKX (34.00). RGGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWIFX: RGGKX (0) vs CWIFX (250). RGGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.36 vs. CWIFX (22.63). RGGKX return over 5 years is better than : 70.85 vs. CWIFX (39.23).
| CWIFX | RGGKX | CWIFX / RGGKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.10 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.49 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.724 | 11.998 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 1.99B | 7,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.36 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.63 | 28.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.32 | 74.07 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.23 | 70.85 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.84 | 264.00 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers