Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIFX vs RGGRX
CWIFX vs RGGRX Comparison
Open Charts CWIFX vs RGGRX
CWIFX vs RGGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIFX vs. RGGRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIFX is a Buy and RGGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGGRX (1.99B). CWIFX pays higher dividends than RGGRX: CWIFX (1.46) vs RGGRX (1.29). CWIFX was incepted earlier than RGGRX: CWIFX (24 years) vs RGGRX (7 years). CWIFX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RGGRX (0.70). CWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGGRX (34.00). RGGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWIFX: RGGRX (0) vs CWIFX (250). RGGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.12 vs. CWIFX (22.63). RGGRX return over 5 years is better than : 73.47 vs. CWIFX (39.23).
| CWIFX | RGGRX | CWIFX / RGGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.55 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.70 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.724 | 12.288 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 1.99B | 7,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.63 | 29.12 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.32 | 77.05 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.23 | 73.47 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers