Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWIFX vs RGGYX
CWIFX vs RGGYX Comparison
Open Charts CWIFX vs RGGYX
CWIFX vs RGGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWIFX vs. RGGYX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWIFX is a Buy and RGGYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWIFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGGYX (1.99B). CWIFX pays higher dividends than RGGYX: CWIFX (1.46) vs RGGYX (0.92). CWIFX was incepted earlier than RGGYX: CWIFX (24 years) vs RGGYX (15 years). CWIFX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RGGYX (0.80). CWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGGYX (34.00). CWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGGYX: CWIFX (250) vs RGGYX (1000000). RGGYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.02 vs. CWIFX (22.63). RGGYX return over 5 years is better than : 74.38 vs. CWIFX (39.23).
| CWIFX | RGGYX | CWIFX / RGGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.60 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.80 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.724 | 12.278 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 1.99B | 7,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.92 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.63 | 29.02 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.32 | 76.80 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.23 | 74.38 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.84 | 196.94 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers