Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWSGX vs WCMLX
CWSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts CWSGX vs WCMLX
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap Growth I
Price$17.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.36M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
CWSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSGX has more cash in the bank: 98.4M vs. WCMLX (45M). CWSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: CWSGX (2.21) vs WCMLX (0.00). CWSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: CWSGX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). CWSGX (2.09) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. CWSGX (60.00). CWSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: CWSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). CWSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.73 vs. WCMLX (7.61). CWSGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.54 vs. WCMLX (22.08).
| CWSGX | WCMLX | CWSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.99 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.092 | 6.610 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.4M | 45M | 219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 7.61 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.80 | 29.46 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.54 | 22.08 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement