Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWSGX vs WCMLX
CWSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts CWSGX vs WCMLX
CWSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSGX has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. WCMLX (54.7M). CWSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: CWSGX (0.04) vs WCMLX (0.00). CWSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: CWSGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). CWSGX (1.86) and WCMLX (1.79) have similar cost to investors . WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. CWSGX (72.00). CWSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: CWSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). CWSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.98 vs. WCMLX (22.34). CWSGX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. WCMLX (0.96).
| CWSGX | WCMLX | CWSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.99 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.79 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.165 | 14.608 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 54.7M | 346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.98 | 22.34 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.22 | 30.12 | 359% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | 0.96 | 3,047% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers