Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWSGX vs WCMNX
CWSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts CWSGX vs WCMNX
CWSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSGX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSGX has more cash in the bank: 195M vs. WCMNX (51.9M). CWSGX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: CWSGX (0.04) vs WCMNX (0.00). CWSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: CWSGX (9 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than CWSGX (1.86). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. CWSGX (72.00). CWSGX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CWSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.57 vs. WCMNX (16.65). CWSGX return over 5 years is better than : 29.21 vs. WCMNX (1.76).
| CWSGX | WCMNX | CWSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.24 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.04 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.598 | 11.144 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 195M | 51.9M | 376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.57 | 16.65 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.00 | 31.41 | 347% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.21 | 1.76 | 1,663% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers