Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWVGX vs RERBX
CWVGX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts CWVGX vs RERBX
CWVGX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWVGX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWVGX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. CWVGX (818M). RERBX pays higher dividends than CWVGX: RERBX (2.19) vs CWVGX (0.94). CWVGX was incepted earlier than RERBX: CWVGX (34 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.57) is less costly to investors than CWVGX (1.21). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. CWVGX (29.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWVGX: RERBX (250) vs CWVGX (1000). CWVGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. RERBX (2.89). CWVGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.81 vs. RERBX (-8.98).
| CWVGX | RERBX | CWVGX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.57 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.57 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.207 | 5.930 | 138% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 818M | 140B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 2.89 | 318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.98 | 23.84 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.81 | -8.98 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.65 | 38.87 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers