CX
Price
$7.62
Change
-$0.12 (-1.55%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.14B
4 days until earnings call
MLM
Price
$565.03
Change
+$18.67 (+3.42%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
37.96B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs MLM

Header iconCX vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts CX vs MLMBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$7.62
Change-$0.12 (-1.55%)
Volume$5.67M
Capitalization13.14B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$565.03
Change+$18.67 (+3.42%)
Volume$407.64K
Capitalization37.96B
CX vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. MLM commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and MLM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $7.62 vs. MLM: $565.03)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. MLM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 47% vs. MLM: 107%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.14B vs. MLM: $37.96B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.14B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $37.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CX and MLM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.14% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($38B) has a higher market cap than CX($13.1B). CX has higher P/E ratio than MLM: CX (73.74) vs MLM (31.28). CX YTD gains are higher at: 36.010 vs. MLM (9.733). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.17B vs. CX (1.72B). MLM has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. CX (533M). MLM has less debt than CX: MLM (4.73B) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than MLM: CX (17B) vs MLM (6.78B).
CXMLMCX / MLM
Capitalization13.1B38B34%
EBITDA1.72B2.17B79%
Gain YTD36.0109.733370%
P/E Ratio73.7431.28236%
Revenue17B6.78B251%
Total Cash533M1.27B42%
Total Debt9.16B4.73B194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
CX
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8661
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4716
SMR RATING
1..100
6462
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4032
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (18) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (86). This means that CX’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (47). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (62) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (64). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (40). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CX (97). This means that MLM’s stock grew significantly faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTUS40.400.05
+0.13%
Hull Tactical US ETF
XIDE30.280.01
+0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & PrmIncETF-Dec
FLXN24.99N/A
N/A
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
FNDC42.11-0.13
-0.31%
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
SMRI32.60-0.17
-0.53%
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-1.55%
MLM - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
CRH - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
EXP - CX
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
VMC - CX
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
KNF - CX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
More

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+2.16%
VMC - MLM
89%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
EXP - MLM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
KNF - MLM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
CRH - MLM
66%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
BCC - MLM
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
More