Ad is loading...
CXHYX vs NSAOX
CXHYX vs NSAOX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs NSAOX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.42B
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opps A
Price$9.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
CXHYX vs NSAOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. NSAOX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and NSAOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. NSAOX (1.06B). CXHYX pays higher dividends than NSAOX: CXHYX (4.76) vs NSAOX (4.22). CXHYX was incepted earlier than NSAOX: CXHYX (39 years) vs NSAOX (10 years). CXHYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NSAOX (0.81). NSAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CXHYX (19.00). CXHYX initial investment is less costly to investors than NSAOX (3%) vs NSAOX (3%). CXHYX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSAOX: CXHYX (1000) vs NSAOX (3000). NSAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.39 vs. CXHYX (0.15). CXHYX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. NSAOX (7.05).
| CXHYX | NSAOX | CXHYX / NSAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.81 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.798 | -1.136 | 246% |
| Front Load | 5% | 3% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 1.06B | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.76 | 4.22 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.15 | 1.39 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.36 | 8.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 7.05 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.03 | 21.85 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers