CXM
Price
$8.63
Change
-$0.06 (-0.69%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.35B
49 days until earnings call
SAFE
Price
$14.97
Change
-$0.48 (-3.11%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs SAFE

Header iconCXM vs SAFE Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs SAFEBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$8.63
Change-$0.06 (-0.69%)
Volume$29.02K
Capitalization3.35B
Safehold
Price$14.97
Change-$0.48 (-3.11%)
Volume$311.77K
Capitalization1.46B
CXM vs SAFE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. SAFE commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Buy and SAFE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CXM: $8.62 vs. SAFE: $14.97)
Brand notoriety: CXM and SAFE are both not notable
CXM represents the Packaged Software, while SAFE is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 78% vs. SAFE: 86%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $3.35B vs. SAFE: $1.46B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.35B. SAFE’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAFE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than SAFE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SAFE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the short-term than SAFE.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.22% price change this week, while SAFE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

SAFE is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.69% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.56% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($3.35B) has a higher market cap than SAFE($1.46B). CXM has higher P/E ratio than SAFE: CXM (67.67) vs SAFE (8.80). CXM YTD gains are higher at: 2.012 vs. SAFE (-17.264). SAFE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. CXM (49.4M). CXM has more cash in the bank: 663M vs. SAFE (28.5M). CXM has less debt than SAFE: CXM (33.3M) vs SAFE (3.97B). CXM has higher revenues than SAFE: CXM (732M) vs SAFE (353M).
CXMSAFECXM / SAFE
Capitalization3.35B1.46B229%
EBITDA49.4M140M35%
Gain YTD2.012-17.264-12%
P/E Ratio67.678.80769%
Revenue732M353M207%
Total Cash663M28.5M2,326%
Total Debt33.3M3.97B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAFE: Fundamental Ratings
SAFE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSAFE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIFAX12.31N/A
N/A
MFS Diversified Income A
SBSPX48.62N/A
N/A
Franklin S&P 500 Index A
ARIGX16.29N/A
N/A
Aristotle Growth Equity I
HSWCX20.04N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders International Stk C
PBSYX14.30N/A
N/A
Polen US Small Company Growth Y

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-0.69%
SPT - CXM
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
CRM - CXM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
AMPL - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
COIN - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
PATH - CXM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
More