CXM
Price
$5.34
Change
-$0.04 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPT
Price
$7.29
Change
+$0.17 (+2.39%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
438.17M
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs SPT

Header iconCXM vs SPT Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs SPTBanner chart's image
CXM vs SPT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. SPT commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and SPT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $5.34 vs. SPT: $7.29)
Brand notoriety: CXM and SPT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 74% vs. SPT: 123%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.25B vs. SPT: $438.17M
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.25B. SPT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $438.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CXM and SPT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SPT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPT is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while SPT (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

SPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($1.25B) has a higher market cap than SPT($438M). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -31.362 vs. SPT (-35.315). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.1M vs. SPT (-21.81M). CXM has more cash in the bank: 443M vs. SPT (112M). CXM has less debt than SPT: CXM (43.8M) vs SPT (46.6M). CXM has higher revenues than SPT: CXM (871M) vs SPT (470M).
CXMSPTCXM / SPT
Capitalization1.25B438M286%
EBITDA71.1M-21.81M-326%
Gain YTD-31.362-35.31589%
P/E Ratio44.50N/A-
Revenue871M470M185%
Total Cash443M112M396%
Total Debt43.8M46.6M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPT: Fundamental Ratings
SPT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEJCX6.180.07
+1.15%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap C
RWEBX68.280.40
+0.59%
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
CIAOX52.25N/A
N/A
Capital Advisors Growth Investor
LAMFX27.04N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
HFCIX43.21N/A
N/A
Hennessy Focus Institutional

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-0.74%
FRSH - CXM
67%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
BL - CXM
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
SPT - CXM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
DOCU - CXM
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
ASAN - CXM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
More

SPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPT has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPT jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPT
1D Price
Change %
SPT100%
+2.39%
FRSH - SPT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
TEAM - SPT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
CXM - SPT
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
CRM - SPT
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
COIN - SPT
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More