CXM
Price
$5.69
Change
+$0.19 (+3.45%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPT
Price
$7.57
Change
+$0.25 (+3.42%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
455M
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs SPT

CXM vs SPT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. SPT commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and SPT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $5.69 vs. SPT: $7.57)
Brand notoriety: CXM and SPT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 56% vs. SPT: 31%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.33B vs. SPT: $455M
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.33B. SPT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $455M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $473.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CXM and SPT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SPT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the short-term than SPT.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.40% price change this week, while SPT (@Packaged Software) price change was -12.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

SPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($1.33B) has a higher market cap than SPT($455M). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -26.864 vs. SPT (-32.831). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.1M vs. SPT (-21.81M). CXM has more cash in the bank: 443M vs. SPT (112M). CXM has less debt than SPT: CXM (43.8M) vs SPT (46.6M). CXM has higher revenues than SPT: CXM (871M) vs SPT (470M).
CXMSPTCXM / SPT
Capitalization1.33B455M293%
EBITDA71.1M-21.81M-326%
Gain YTD-26.864-32.83182%
P/E Ratio47.42N/A-
Revenue871M470M185%
Total Cash443M112M396%
Total Debt43.8M46.6M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPT: Fundamental Ratings
SPT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHCIX71.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Health Care I
RPMGX98.68N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
JSCSX22.13N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Small Company I
JMNSX15.28N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral I
MELSX17.89N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs R6

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
+3.45%
FRSH - CXM
69%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
BL - CXM
68%
Closely correlated
+4.74%
SPT - CXM
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
DOCU - CXM
65%
Loosely correlated
+7.23%
CRM - CXM
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.29%
More

SPT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPT has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPT jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPT
1D Price
Change %
SPT100%
+3.42%
FRSH - SPT
69%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
TEAM - SPT
66%
Loosely correlated
+8.40%
ASAN - SPT
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.41%
CXM - SPT
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
DOCU - SPT
64%
Loosely correlated
+7.23%
More