It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXW’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while GEO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.20%.
CXW is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
GEO is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
CXW | GEO | CXW / GEO | |
Capitalization | 1.75B | 1.81B | 97% |
EBITDA | 296M | 482M | 61% |
Gain YTD | 47.006 | 145.614 | 32% |
P/E Ratio | 26.34 | 19.81 | 133% |
Revenue | 1.9B | 2.41B | 79% |
Total Cash | 122M | 94M | 130% |
Total Debt | 1.21B | 1.89B | 64% |
CXW | GEO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GEO's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for CXW (99). This means that GEO’s stock grew significantly faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (50). This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's SMR Rating (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GEO (95). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to GEO’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (35). This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
GEO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (34). This means that GEO’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW | GEO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago70% | 3 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 14 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
AFOYX | 17.55 | -0.08 | -0.45% |
Ariel Focus Institutional | |||
FWATX | 14.39 | -0.07 | -0.48% |
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A | |||
JANBX | 48.15 | -0.51 | -1.05% |
Janus Henderson Balanced D | |||
DGLRX | 22.95 | -0.36 | -1.54% |
BNY Mellon Global Stock - I | |||
MPSSX | 22.19 | -0.38 | -1.68% |
BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy M |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CXW | 100% | -0.33% | ||
GEO - CXW | 70% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
ALEX - CXW | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
KIM - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
GOOD - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
BFS - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEO has been closely correlated with CXW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEO jumps, then CXW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GEO | 100% | +1.92% | ||
CXW - GEO | 80% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
LOPE - GEO | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
KIM - GEO | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
AHT - GEO | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
LINC - GEO | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More |