CXW
Price
$21.52
Change
+$0.14 (+0.65%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.29B
40 days until earnings call
KIM
Price
$21.60
Change
+$0.12 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 26, 02:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.55B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXW vs KIM

Header iconCXW vs KIM Comparison
Open Charts CXW vs KIMBanner chart's image
CoreCivic
Price$21.52
Change+$0.14 (+0.65%)
Volume$445
Capitalization2.29B
Kimco Realty
Price$21.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.56%)
Volume$6.44K
Capitalization14.55B
CXW vs KIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXW vs. KIM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Buy and KIM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CXW: $21.38 vs. KIM: $21.48)
Brand notoriety: CXW and KIM are both not notable
CXW represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while KIM is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXW: 102% vs. KIM: 75%
Market capitalization -- CXW: $2.29B vs. KIM: $14.55B
CXW [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.29B. KIM’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $14.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXW is a better buy in the long-term than KIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CXW and KIM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.15% price change this week, while KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXW is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

KIM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.28% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.89% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($14.5B) has a higher market cap than CXW($2.29B). KIM has higher P/E ratio than CXW: KIM (26.20) vs CXW (22.74). CXW YTD gains are higher at: -1.656 vs. KIM (-5.074). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. CXW (325M). KIM has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. CXW (131M). CXW has less debt than KIM: CXW (1.02B) vs KIM (8.28B). KIM (2.1B) and CXW (2B) have equivalent revenues.
CXWKIMCXW / KIM
Capitalization2.29B14.5B16%
EBITDA325M1.41B23%
Gain YTD-1.656-5.07433%
P/E Ratio22.7426.2087%
Revenue2B2.1B95%
Total Cash131M227M58%
Total Debt1.02B8.28B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXW vs KIM: Fundamental Ratings
CXW
KIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
555
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2147
SMR RATING
1..100
7984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3789
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (47). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's SMR Rating (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (84). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (56). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (89). This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXWKIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTCHX30.67N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Growth R3
ABASX21.02N/A
N/A
AB Discovery Value A
SNWIX71.51N/A
N/A
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value I
JAREX13.95N/A
N/A
Easterly Global Real Estate A
TGRFX7.34N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Focus R6

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
-0.74%
GEO - CXW
82%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
ALEX - CXW
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
KIM - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
BFS - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
BRX - CXW
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
More