Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CYPSX vs RMQAX
CYPSX vs RMQAX Comparison
Open Charts CYPSX vs RMQAX
CYPSX vs RMQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CYPSX vs. RMQAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYPSX is a Buy and RMQAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQAX has more cash in the bank: 858M vs. CYPSX (21.3M). RMQAX pays higher dividends than CYPSX: RMQAX (0.00) vs CYPSX (0.00). CYPSX was incepted earlier than RMQAX: CYPSX (22 years) vs RMQAX (12 years). CYPSX (2.62) is less costly to investors than RMQAX (1.82). RMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 695.00 vs. CYPSX (264.00). RMQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CYPSX: RMQAX (2500) vs CYPSX (15000). RMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.16 vs. CYPSX (3.14). RMQAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.37 vs. CYPSX (-8.26).
| CYPSX | RMQAX | CYPSX / RMQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 1.26 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 1.82 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.684 | 31.904 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 15000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 858M | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 15.16 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.40 | 63.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.26 | 45.37 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.31 | 1067.37 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement