Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SCHM
CZA vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SCHM
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.18
Change-$0.98 (-0.90%)
Volume$100
Net Assets181.53M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.98
Change-$0.29 (-0.99%)
Volume$7.02K
Net Assets11.86B
CZA vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SCHM commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and SCHM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.9B vs. CZA (182M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SCHM (6.319) vs CZA (5.074). CZA was incepted earlier than SCHM: CZA (18 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.074 | 6.319 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 182M | 11.9B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 13.00 | 862% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.41 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||