Ad is loading...
CZA vs SCHM
CZA vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SCHM
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$102.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.37M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$26.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$3.7K
Net Assets10.98B
CZA vs SCHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SCHM commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11B vs. CZA (183M). CZA has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: CZA (-0.895) vs SCHM (-4.346). CZA was incepted earlier than SCHM: CZA (18 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | -0.895 | -4.346 | 21% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 11B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 13.00 | 908% |
| Yield | 1.31 | 1.52 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||