Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SCHM
CZA vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SCHM
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$109.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.12%)
Volume$1.52K
Net Assets182.7M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.75M
Net Assets12.25B
CZA vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SCHM commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Buy and SCHM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.3B vs. CZA (183M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SCHM (8.425) vs CZA (5.399). CZA was incepted earlier than SCHM: CZA (18 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.399 | 8.425 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 12.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 13.00 | 862% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.37 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||