| CZA | SCHM | CZA / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.549 | 17.463 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 176M | 14.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,300% |
| Turnover | 140.00 | 17.00 | 824% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.24 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| CZA | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.