Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SPMD
CZA vs SPMD Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SPMD
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.82
Change+$0.48 (+0.44%)
Volume$100
Net Assets181.84M
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF
Price$58.19
Change+$0.76 (+1.32%)
Volume$100
Net Assets14.35B
CZA vs SPMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SPMD commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and SPMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMD has more net assets: 14.4B vs. CZA (182M). SPMD has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SPMD (5.796) vs CZA (4.283). CZA was incepted earlier than SPMD: CZA (18 years) vs SPMD (20 years). SPMD (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SPMD (20.00) vs SPMD (20.00).
| CZA | SPMD | CZA / SPMD | |
| Gain YTD | 4.283 | 5.796 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 182M | 14.4B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,300% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 20.00 | 560% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.39 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SPMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SPMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMD has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMD jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMD | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| EVR - SPMD | 86% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| JHG - SPMD | 86% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| BDC - SPMD | 86% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| SF - SPMD | 85% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| WTFC - SPMD | 84% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||