Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs SPMD
CZA vs SPMD Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs SPMD
CZA vs SPMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. SPMD commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and SPMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMD has more net assets: 18.3B vs. CZA (176M). SPMD has a higher annual dividend yield than CZA: SPMD (13.379) vs CZA (9.549). CZA was incepted earlier than SPMD: CZA (19 years) vs SPMD (21 years). SPMD (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover SPMD (13.00) vs SPMD (13.00).
| CZA | SPMD | CZA / SPMD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.549 | 13.379 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 176M | 18.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,300% |
| Turnover | 140.00 | 13.00 | 1,077% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.23 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | SPMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OVS | 40.15 | 0.37 | +0.93% |
| Overlay Shares Small Cap Equity ETF | |||
| UDIV | 61.60 | 0.56 | +0.92% |
| Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | |||
| BINV | 44.10 | 0.21 | +0.48% |
| Brandes International ETF | |||
| IBDU | 22.81 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corp ETF | |||
| SBB | 23.20 | -0.13 | -0.56% |
| ProShares Short SmallCap600 | |||
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SPMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMD has been closely correlated with JBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMD jumps, then JBL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMD | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| JBL - SPMD | 80% Closely correlated | +5.05% | ||
| CATY - SPMD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MAC - SPMD | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| DAN - SPMD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| KMT - SPMD | 77% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||