| CZA | SPMD | CZA / SPMD | |
| Gain YTD | 12.950 | 16.907 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 185M | 18.9B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,300% |
| Turnover | 140.00 | 13.00 | 1,077% |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.23 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
| CZA | SPMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMD has been closely correlated with JBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMD jumps, then JBL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMD | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| JBL - SPMD | 80% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| CATY - SPMD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| MAC - SPMD | 79% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| DAN - SPMD | 79% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| KMT - SPMD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||