CZFS
Price
$57.75
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
May 8, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
231.58M
88 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$28.76
Change
+$0.59 (+2.09%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
629.13M
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CZFS vs MCBS

Header iconCZFS vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts CZFS vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Services
Price$57.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization231.58M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$28.76
Change+$0.59 (+2.09%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization629.13M
CZFS vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZFS vs. MCBS commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a StrongBuy and MCBS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CZFS: $57.73 vs. MCBS: $28.17)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 50% vs. MCBS: 73%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $231.58M vs. MCBS: $629.13M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $231.58M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CZFS and MCBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than MCBS.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.06% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($629M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($232M). CZFS (11.92) and MCBS (11.86) have similar P/E ratio . CZFS YTD gains are higher at: -8.004 vs. MCBS (-10.450). CZFS (322M) and MCBS (334M) have identical debt. MCBS has higher revenues than CZFS: MCBS (118M) vs CZFS (91.9M).
CZFSMCBSCZFS / MCBS
Capitalization232M629M37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.004-10.45077%
P/E Ratio11.9211.86101%
Revenue91.9M118M78%
Total CashN/A251M-
Total Debt322M334M96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6025
SMR RATING
1..100
1312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7564
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (84). This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (60). This means that MCBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (13). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (55). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (75). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBMIX11.250.04
+0.36%
BBH Select Series - Mid Cap I
RYRTX48.31N/A
N/A
Rydex Retailing A
LEGCX45.74N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
PGWCX30.48N/A
N/A
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
VYMSX18.12N/A
N/A
Voya Mid Cap Research Enhanced Index I

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with BFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
-0.03%
BFC - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
AROW - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
MCBS - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
PFIS - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
STEL - CZFS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+0.64%
CTBI - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
TRMK - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
UBSI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
IBOC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
BANF - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
More