CZFS
Price
$60.49
Change
-$1.64 (-2.64%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
290.79M
59 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$29.99
Change
-$0.13 (-0.43%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
765.88M
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs MCBS

Header iconCZFS vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts CZFS vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Services
Price$60.49
Change-$1.64 (-2.64%)
Volume$2.88K
Capitalization290.79M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$29.99
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
Volume$23.54K
Capitalization765.88M
CZFS vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZFS vs. MCBS commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Hold and MCBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CZFS: $60.49 vs. MCBS: $29.99)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 28% vs. MCBS: 56%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $290.79M vs. MCBS: $765.88M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $290.79M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $765.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than MCBS.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.75% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($766M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($291M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: MCBS (11.67) vs CZFS (9.19). CZFS YTD gains are higher at: -1.817 vs. MCBS (-3.837). CZFS has less debt than MCBS: CZFS (313M) vs MCBS (433M). MCBS has higher revenues than CZFS: MCBS (145M) vs CZFS (105M).
CZFSMCBSCZFS / MCBS
Capitalization291M766M38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.817-3.83747%
P/E Ratio9.1911.6779%
Revenue105M145M72%
Total CashN/A279M-
Total Debt313M433M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1812
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6132
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5053
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (64). This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (61). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CZFS (100). This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (53). This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBS (100). This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VINAX150.94N/A
N/A
Vanguard Industrials Index Admiral
DALVX21.17N/A
N/A
Dunham Large Cap Value A
FSLSX56.86N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Strategies
PQNAX27.02N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
FOVIX28.84N/A
N/A
First Trust/Confluence Small Cap Val I

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with BFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
-2.64%
BFC - CZFS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
PFIS - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
MCBS - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
AROW - CZFS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
SMBC - CZFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with SBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then SBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-0.43%
SBSI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
TCBK - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
IBCP - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
MBWM - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
SMBC - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More