CZFS
Price
$57.06
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
274.26M
23 days until earnings call
SMBC
Price
$51.53
Change
-$0.06 (-0.12%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
582.49M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs SMBC

Header iconCZFS vs SMBC Comparison
Open Charts CZFS vs SMBCBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Services
Price$57.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$7.39K
Capitalization274.26M
Southern Missouri Ban
Price$51.53
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
Volume$128.89K
Capitalization582.49M
CZFS vs SMBC Comparison Chart in %
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZFS vs. SMBC commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Buy and SMBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CZFS: $57.06 vs. SMBC: $51.53)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and SMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 77% vs. SMBC: 330%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $274.26M vs. SMBC: $582.49M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $274.26M. SMBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $582.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMBC is a better buy in the long-term than CZFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than SMBC.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.20% price change this week, while SMBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

SMBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBC($582M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($274M). SMBC has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: SMBC (9.96) vs CZFS (8.67). CZFS YTD gains are higher at: -6.655 vs. SMBC (-9.049). SMBC has less debt than CZFS: SMBC (127M) vs CZFS (313M). SMBC has higher revenues than CZFS: SMBC (178M) vs CZFS (105M).
CZFSSMBCCZFS / SMBC
Capitalization274M582M47%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.655-9.04974%
P/E Ratio8.679.9687%
Revenue105M178M59%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt313M127M246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs SMBC: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
SMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6951
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6243
SMR RATING
1..100
4434
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7548

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as SMBC (39) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (62) in the null industry. This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's SMR Rating (34) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (44) in the null industry. This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SMBC (62) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SMBC (83) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSSMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLPNY7.580.38
+5.21%
Voestalpine AG
BHKLY94.430.43
+0.46%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
NKRKF6.95N/A
N/A
Nokian Tyres Plc.
CCUR2500.00N/A
N/A
CCUR Holdings, Inc.
KBLB0.09N/A
-1.22%
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+0.02%
MCBS - CZFS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
BFC - CZFS
71%
Closely correlated
+3.19%
PFIS - CZFS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
BY - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
SMBC - CZFS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
More

SMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBC has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBC jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBC
1D Price
Change %
SMBC100%
-0.12%
MCBS - SMBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
TCBK - SMBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
BY - SMBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
MBWM - SMBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
STBA - SMBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
More