Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs FAFGX
CZMGX vs FAFGX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs FAFGX
CZMGX vs FAFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. FAFGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Buy and FAFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CZMGX (85.2M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: FAFGX (0.43) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than FAFGX: CZMGX (10 years) vs FAFGX (6 years). CZMGX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.38). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FAFGX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFGX: CZMGX (100) vs FAFGX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. FAFGX (0.37). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.12 vs. CZMGX (7.28).
| CZMGX | FAFGX | CZMGX / FAFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.38 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.38 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.230 | 9.256 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.2M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 0.37 | 2,606% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.97 | 44.11 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.28 | 15.12 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement