Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs FAFGX
CZMGX vs FAFGX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs FAFGX
CZMGX vs FAFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CZMGX (87.9M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: FAFGX (0.43) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than FAFGX: CZMGX (9 years) vs FAFGX (6 years). CZMGX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.38). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FAFGX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFGX: CZMGX (100) vs FAFGX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.99 vs. FAFGX (8.90). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.58 vs. CZMGX (12.16).
| CZMGX | FAFGX | CZMGX / FAFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.38 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.38 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.136 | 6.466 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.9M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.99 | 8.90 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.37 | 46.51 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.16 | 17.58 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement