Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs FAFGX
CZMGX vs FAFGX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs FAFGX
CZMGX vs FAFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CZMGX (88.6M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: FAFGX (0.43) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than FAFGX: CZMGX (10 years) vs FAFGX (6 years). CZMGX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.38). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FAFGX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFGX: CZMGX (100) vs FAFGX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.19 vs. FAFGX (4.62). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.84 vs. CZMGX (10.23).
| CZMGX | FAFGX | CZMGX / FAFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.38 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.38 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.325 | 7.288 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 4.62 | 372% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.09 | 40.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.23 | 17.84 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement