Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs FFAFX
CZMGX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs FFAFX
CZMGX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. FFAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Buy and FFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CZMGX (85.2M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: FFAFX (0.45) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: CZMGX (10 years) vs FFAFX (6 years). CZMGX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: CZMGX (100) vs FFAFX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. FFAFX (0.40). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.29 vs. CZMGX (7.28).
| CZMGX | FFAFX | CZMGX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.34 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.34 | 347% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.230 | 9.280 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.2M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 0.40 | 2,450% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.97 | 44.24 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.28 | 15.29 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers