Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs GFACX
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs GFACX
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
Price$18.56
Change-$0.21 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. CZMGX (4.45B). CZMGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CZMGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CZMGX (8 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CZMGX (0.76). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CZMGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. CZMGX (-9.15). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. CZMGX (16.69).
| CZMGX | GFACX | CZMGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.36 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.728 | 4.705 | -207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.45B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.15 | 5.17 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 46.73 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.69 | 39.11 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement