Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs GFACX
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs GFACX
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CZMGX (85.2M). CZMGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CZMGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CZMGX (10 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CZMGX (1.18). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CZMGX (100) vs GFACX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. GFACX (-2.39). CZMGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.28 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| CZMGX | GFACX | CZMGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.35 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.35 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.230 | 8.529 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.2M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | -2.39 | -407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.97 | 34.46 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.28 | 3.85 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers