Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs GFACX
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs GFACX
CZMGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CZMGX (87.9M). CZMGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CZMGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CZMGX (9 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CZMGX (1.11). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CZMGX (100) vs GFACX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.99 vs. GFACX (5.89). CZMGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.16 vs. GFACX (6.08).
| CZMGX | GFACX | CZMGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.35 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.35 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.136 | 5.973 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.9M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.99 | 5.89 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.37 | 36.71 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.16 | 6.08 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement