Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs RGACX
CZMGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs RGACX
CZMGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. CZMGX (92.7M). CZMGX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CZMGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CZMGX (9 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CZMGX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CZMGX (100) vs RGACX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. RGACX (14.24). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. CZMGX (14.71).
| CZMGX | RGACX | CZMGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.93 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.93 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.276 | 10.291 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.7M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.84 | 14.24 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 51.07 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 22.53 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement