Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs RGAFX
CZMGX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs RGAFX
CZMGX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. CZMGX (92.7M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: RGAFX (0.46) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: CZMGX (9 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). CZMGX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: CZMGX (100) vs RGAFX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. RGAFX (15.34). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. CZMGX (14.71).
| CZMGX | RGAFX | CZMGX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.34 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.34 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.276 | 10.570 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.7M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.84 | 15.34 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 55.04 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 26.83 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers