Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMGX vs RGAGX
CZMGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CZMGX vs RGAGX
CZMGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMGX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. CZMGX (92.7M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CZMGX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CZMGX (0.00). CZMGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CZMGX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CZMGX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). CZMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). CZMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: CZMGX (100) vs RGAGX (250). CZMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. RGAGX (15.41). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. CZMGX (14.71).
| CZMGX | RGAGX | CZMGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.29 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.29 | 383% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.276 | 10.599 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.7M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.84 | 15.41 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 55.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.71 | 27.14 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers