Ad is loading...
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$13.98
Change-$1.02 (-6.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. CZMSX (2.05B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FTHFX (0.82) vs CZMSX (0.50). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (8 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. CZMSX (-5.62). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 137.69 vs. CZMSX (54.26).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.63 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.592 | -4.888 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 9.94B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.82 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.62 | -5.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.33 | 26.25 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.26 | 137.69 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...