Ad is loading...
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.20
Change-$0.43 (-2.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.65
Change-$1.01 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.13B
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. CZMSX (2.11B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FTHFX (0.95) vs CZMSX (0.58). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (8 years) vs FTHFX (13 years). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). CZMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. FTHFX (2.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 69.97 vs. CZMSX (6.05).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.280 | -1.695 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 10.1B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 2.86 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.50 | 31.39 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.05 | 69.97 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers