Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.42
Change-$0.20 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.89
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a StrongBuy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. CZMSX (1.5B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FTHFX (0.69) vs CZMSX (0.45). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. CZMSX (1.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.10 vs. CZMSX (9.72).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.63 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.280 | 10.964 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 11.3B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.69 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 3.35 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 59.30 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.72 | 99.10 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 174.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement