Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$15.84
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.58
Change+$0.24 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.74B
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. CZMSX (1.41B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: FTHFX (0.70) vs CZMSX (0.44). CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.71 vs. CZMSX (-8.48). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 77.88 vs. CZMSX (-4.68).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.63 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.473 | 6.429 | -54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 10.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.48 | -5.71 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.25 | 36.08 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.68 | 77.88 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 158.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement