Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. CZMSX (1.31B). FTHFX (0.59) and CZMSX (0.59) have matching dividends . CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (9 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.99 vs. CZMSX (18.18). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.64 vs. CZMSX (-15.31).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.64 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.64 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.188 | 12.922 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 11.2B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.59 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.18 | 30.99 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.89 | 61.63 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.31 | 61.64 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 248.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers