Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CZMSX (1.32B). FTHFX (0.57) and CZMSX (0.55) have matching dividends . CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. CZMSX (13.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. CZMSX (-11.21).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.64 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.64 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.342 | 15.175 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 12.1B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.57 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | 25.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.14 | 55.30 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.21 | 65.58 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 231.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement