Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs FTHFX
CZMSX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CZMSX (1.18B). CZMSX (0.57) and FTHFX (0.56) have matching dividends . CZMSX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CZMSX (10 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CZMSX (100) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. CZMSX (14.79). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. CZMSX (-10.48).
| CZMSX | FTHFX | CZMSX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.64 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.64 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.256 | 18.613 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 12.1B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.56 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.79 | 24.72 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.91 | 64.64 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.48 | 67.28 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 241.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement