Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs NAESX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.64
Change+$0.36 (+2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.36
Change+$2.36 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. CZMSX (1.47B). NAESX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: NAESX (1.22) vs CZMSX (0.44). CZMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CZMSX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CZMSX (100) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.84 vs. CZMSX (-9.14). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. CZMSX (-3.31).
| CZMSX | NAESX | CZMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.402 | 4.437 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 3000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.22 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.14 | -3.84 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.93 | 30.33 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | 38.26 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement