Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs NAESX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$16.42
Change-$0.20 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.49
Change-$1.24 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. CZMSX (1.5B). NAESX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: NAESX (1.23) vs CZMSX (0.45). CZMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CZMSX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CZMSX (100) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.42 vs. CZMSX (1.33). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 58.94 vs. CZMSX (9.72).
| CZMSX | NAESX | CZMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.280 | 7.684 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 3000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.23 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 10.42 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.73 | 48.54 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.72 | 58.94 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement