Ad is loading...
CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs NAESX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Eq Strat Inst
Price$13.98
Change-$1.02 (-6.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.10
Change-$7.24 (-6.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. CZMSX (2.05B). NAESX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: NAESX (1.39) vs CZMSX (0.50). CZMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CZMSX (8 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CZMSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). CZMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CZMSX (100) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. CZMSX (-5.62). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 115.68 vs. CZMSX (54.26).
| CZMSX | NAESX | CZMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.592 | -5.833 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 3000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 153B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.62 | 1.18 | -478% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.33 | 6.44 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.26 | 115.68 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...