Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. CZMSX (1.32B). NAESX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: NAESX (1.07) vs CZMSX (0.55). CZMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CZMSX (10 years) vs NAESX (66 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: NAESX (0) vs CZMSX (100). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. CZMSX (13.98). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. CZMSX (-11.21).
| CZMSX | NAESX | CZMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.17 | 618% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.342 | 15.738 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 189B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.07 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | 23.34 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.14 | 48.12 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.21 | 38.39 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 157.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers