Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CZMSX vs NAESX
CZMSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMSX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMSX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. CZMSX (1.31B). NAESX pays higher dividends than CZMSX: NAESX (1.08) vs CZMSX (0.59). CZMSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CZMSX (9 years) vs NAESX (66 years). CZMSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CZMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CZMSX: NAESX (0) vs CZMSX (100). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. CZMSX (18.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. CZMSX (-15.31).
| CZMSX | NAESX | CZMSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.17 | 618% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.188 | 15.348 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.08 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.18 | 27.66 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.89 | 57.38 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.31 | 33.59 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 172.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers