Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMVX vs RMEBX
CZMVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CZMVX vs RMEBX
CZMVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CZMVX (5.63B). CZMVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CZMVX (1.16) vs RMEBX (1.04). CZMVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CZMVX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CZMVX (0.70). CZMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). CZMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CZMVX (100) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. CZMVX (5.78). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. CZMVX (3.91).
| CZMVX | RMEBX | CZMVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.759 | 6.308 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.63B | 117B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.04 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 9.11 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.04 | 34.37 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.91 | 34.74 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement