Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMVX vs RMEBX
CZMVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CZMVX vs RMEBX
CZMVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CZMVX (5.69B). CZMVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CZMVX (1.08) vs RMEBX (0.99). CZMVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CZMVX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CZMVX (0.70). CZMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). CZMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CZMVX (100) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. CZMVX (6.42). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. CZMVX (4.79).
| CZMVX | RMEBX | CZMVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.199 | 9.416 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 118B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 8.96 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.24 | 32.63 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.79 | 36.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement