Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CZMVX (5.74B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CZMVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CZMVX (1.06). CZMVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CZMVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CZMVX (0.70). CZMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CZMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CZMVX (100) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. CZMVX (3.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. CZMVX (5.96).
| CZMVX | RMFCX | CZMVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.588 | 8.539 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 117B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.71 | 4.75 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.97 | 35.38 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.96 | 35.61 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement