Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CZMVX (5.69B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CZMVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs CZMVX (1.10). CZMVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CZMVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CZMVX (0.70). CZMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CZMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CZMVX (100) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. CZMVX (4.46). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. CZMVX (4.76).
| CZMVX | RMFCX | CZMVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.008 | 9.137 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 118B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 8.88 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.33 | 34.84 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 37.23 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement