Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CZMVX (5.62B). RMFCX (1.19) and CZMVX (1.16) have matching dividends . CZMVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CZMVX (9 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CZMVX (0.70). CZMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CZMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CZMVX (100) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. CZMVX (6.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. CZMVX (0.66).
| CZMVX | RMFCX | CZMVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.161 | 5.845 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.62B | 115B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.07 | 10.10 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 34.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.66 | 33.85 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers