Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CZMVX vs RMFCX
CZMVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZMVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZMVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CZMVX (5.69B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CZMVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CZMVX (1.08). CZMVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CZMVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CZMVX (0.70). CZMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CZMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CZMVX (100) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. CZMVX (6.42). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. CZMVX (4.79).
| CZMVX | RMFCX | CZMVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.199 | 9.496 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 118B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 9.09 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.24 | 33.16 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.79 | 37.08 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement