CZR
Price
$44.75
Change
+$1.51 (+3.49%)
Updated
Oct 9, 01:46 PM (EDT)
20 days until earnings call
FLL
Price
$4.99
Change
-$0.01 (-0.20%)
Updated
Oct 9, 01:48 PM (EDT)
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CZR vs FLL

Header iconCZR vs FLL Comparison
Open Charts CZR vs FLLBanner chart's image
Caesars Entertainment
Price$44.75
Change+$1.51 (+3.49%)
Volume$3.31K
CapitalizationN/A
Full House Resorts
Price$4.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.20%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CZR vs FLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CZR vs. FLL commentary
Oct 09, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a Buy and FLL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2024
Stock price -- (CZR: $43.24 vs. FLL: $4.99)
Brand notoriety: CZR and FLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZR: 83% vs. FLL: 25%
Market capitalization -- CZR: $9.34B vs. FLL: $191.63M
CZR [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $9.34B. FLL’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $191.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the long-term than CZR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZR is a better buy in the short-term than FLL.

Price Growth

CZR (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +5.97% price change this week, while FLL (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+1.79% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CZR($9.34B) has a higher market cap than FLL($192M). FLL has higher P/E ratio than CZR: FLL (43.29) vs CZR (11.86). FLL YTD gains are higher at: -7.076 vs. CZR (-7.775). CZR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.56B vs. FLL (31.3M). CZR has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. FLL (36.2M). FLL has less debt than CZR: FLL (515M) vs CZR (25.1B). CZR has higher revenues than FLL: CZR (11.5B) vs FLL (241M).
CZRFLLCZR / FLL
Capitalization9.34B192M4,862%
EBITDA3.56B31.3M11,358%
Gain YTD-7.775-7.076110%
P/E Ratio11.8643.2927%
Revenue11.5B241M4,772%
Total Cash1.01B36.2M2,776%
Total Debt25.1B515M4,874%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZR vs FLL: Fundamental Ratings
CZR
FLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
205
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLL's Valuation (72) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as CZR (78). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's SMR Rating (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (96). This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (54). This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for CZR (91). This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZRFLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CZR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL225.774.08
+1.84%
Apple
TSLA244.503.67
+1.52%
Tesla
SPY573.175.37
+0.95%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X62131.970000-104.691410
-0.17%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME20.71-0.19
-0.91%
GameStop Corp

CZR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been closely correlated with MGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then MGM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZR
1D Price
Change %
CZR100%
-2.82%
MGM - CZR
70%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
RRR - CZR
66%
Closely correlated
-3.89%
PENN - CZR
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
BYD - CZR
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
GDEN - CZR
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with CNTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then CNTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
-0.20%
CNTY - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.89%
BALY - FLL
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
CZR - FLL
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
MCRI - FLL
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
CHDN - FLL
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More