The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 19 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +5.83% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FLL advanced for three days, in 179 of 239 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
FLL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FLL turned negative on September 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 51 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 84%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FLL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator for FLL entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-2.590) is normal, around the industry mean (13.420). P/E Ratio (-0.924) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.815). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.130) is also within normal values, averaging (0.784). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.023) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.204) is also within normal values, averaging (1.049).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FLL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FLL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
INSE saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 15, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 89 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 73 of the 89 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where INSE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator for INSE entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for INSE just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where INSE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Following a +6.82% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where INSE advanced for three days, in 225 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
INSE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 6 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: INSE's P/B Ratio (-5.407) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.824). P/E Ratio (-10.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (2.199). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.476). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.508) is also within normal values, averaging (1.692).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. INSE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. INSE’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 100, placing this stock worse than average.
FLL | INSE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSE's Valuation (6) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as FLL (10) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
INSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
INSE's SMR Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
INSE's Price Growth Rating (91) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as FLL (94) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for INSE (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than INSE’s over the last 12 months.
| FLL | INSE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while INSE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -8.50% price change this week, while INSE (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.62%.
FLL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
INSE is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
@Casinos/Gaming (-3.00% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BST | 48.58 | 0.83 | +1.74% |
| BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | |||
| OGIG | 50.38 | 0.35 | +0.70% |
| ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) | |||
| JUNZ | 36.07 | 0.17 | +0.48% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) | |||
| EMOT | 26.83 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) | |||
| SPXS | 23.91 | -0.36 | -1.48% |
| Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X ETF (SPXS) | |||