Advertisement
CZR vs INSE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Caesars Entertainment (CZR) vs. Inspired Entertainment (INSE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CZR is a large-cap casino operator with a market value of roughly $6 billion and more than $11 billion in debt, while INSE is a small-cap gaming technology supplier valued near $200 million.
- Caesars has posted strong year-to-date share gains but continues to report net losses, weighed down by high interest costs and uneven Las Vegas trends.
- Inspired Entertainment is shifting toward higher-margin digital and interactive products, expanding EBITDA margins to roughly 45%, but faces regulatory and tax headwinds.
- The two companies occupy different ends of the gaming value chain: one owns and operates casinos, the other supplies games and technology to operators worldwide.
- Risk profiles differ sharply, with CZR leveraged to consumer spending and Las Vegas performance, and INSE exposed to UK gaming taxes and Brazil online-betting policy.
Introduction
Investors comparing CZR and INSE are effectively weighing two very different ways to gain exposure to the global gaming industry. Caesars Entertainment is a sprawling casino and hospitality operator, while Inspired Entertainment is a business-to-business supplier of gaming content and technology. This stock comparison is relevant for traders assessing relative performance, market positioning, and risk within the same broad sector but across contrasting business models. The contrast in size, capital structure, and growth drivers makes the pair a useful case study in how AI-driven analysis evaluates stability, momentum, and catalysts when deciding which name currently offers the more favorable setup.
CZR Overview and Recent Performance
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) is the largest casino-entertainment company in the United States, operating resorts primarily under the Caesars, Harrah's, Horseshoe, and Eldorado brands, alongside a digital division spanning online casino (iGaming) and sports betting. The stock has delivered a notable year-to-date gain, rising well above the broader market in recent months, even as the company continues to report GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net losses.
Recent market activity reflects a mixed operating picture. Las Vegas revenues have softened on weaker leisure visitation and lower table-game hold, while the Regional segment has grown, helped by the Caesars Windsor acquisition and capital investments. The Digital segment has been a bright spot, posting record revenue and expanding its EBITDA margin (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization). However, a heavy debt load of more than $11 billion and related interest expense continue to pressure the bottom line. Governance headlines, including recent board resignations, have also drawn investor attention to the company's long-term decision-making.
INSE Overview and Recent Performance
Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) is a provider of gaming content, technology, hardware, and services to licensed gaming, betting, and lottery operators globally. Its offerings span virtual sports, interactive games, server-based gaming terminals, and software-as-a-service (SaaS, or software delivered over the internet) platforms. Unlike Caesars, Inspired does not operate casinos; it supplies the products that operators use.
In recent quarters, Inspired has executed a deliberate shift toward a more digital, capital-light, and higher-margin model, selling its UK holiday parks business and streamlining its pub segment. This restructuring has reduced reported revenue on a year-over-year basis but lifted EBITDA margins to roughly 45%. The company has reaffirmed its full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA target of $112 million to $118 million and has been reducing net leverage while repurchasing shares. At the same time, a sharp increase in the UK Remote Gaming Duty and uncertainty around Brazil's online-betting ban have created near-term headwinds for sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
For investors who prefer a systematic, data-driven approach to stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of automated trading strategies. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and set of covered stocks. Because market conditions change constantly, only the bots best suited to the current environment earn a place in this curated Trending AI Robots section, helping traders identify strategies with demonstrated relevance to present momentum and volatility. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which signals are currently leading the market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most fundamental contrast between these two names is their position in the gaming value chain. CZR is a consumer-facing operator whose results hinge on discretionary spending, hotel occupancy, and casino hold rates, and whose growth increasingly depends on its digital segment scaling against well-funded competitors. INSE is a supplier whose fortunes depend on winning and retaining operator contracts and expanding its content across new regulated markets.
Their financial profiles also diverge. Caesars carries substantial leverage, which amplifies both upside and downside and keeps net income negative despite solid operating performance. Inspired, though much smaller, has been actively deleveraging and improving margins, positioning it as a higher-margin, cash-generative business on a relative basis. On momentum, CZR has shown stronger recent share-price appreciation, while INSE has contended with revenue declines tied to divestitures and tax changes. Risk factors differ as well: CZR is exposed to Las Vegas cyclicality and interest costs, whereas INSE faces concentrated regulatory risk in the UK and Brazil. For traders, the choice is essentially between scale and liquidity versus margin improvement and smaller-cap volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CZR on the strength of its recent upward price momentum and larger, more liquid trading profile, which tend to align with trend-following signals. However, INSE presents a more attractive margin-expansion and deleveraging narrative that could appeal to strategies oriented toward improving fundamentals and lower relative valuation. The verdict is therefore conditional rather than absolute: a momentum-focused AI is more likely to lean toward CZR in the current environment, while a fundamentals-driven model could find INSE's improving profitability more compelling. Neither name offers a risk-free profile, and the appropriate emphasis depends on the strategy's time horizon and tolerance for volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a Buy and INSE is a StrongBuy.
CZR's RSI Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for CZR moved out of oversold territory on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 39 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 31 of the 39 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CZR as a result. In 71 of 105 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CZR just turned positive on November 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where CZR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Following a +0.24% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CZR advanced for three days, in 196 of 280 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CZR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
CZR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CZR entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.765) is normal, around the industry mean (14.575). P/E Ratio (-12.877) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.870). CZR's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.468) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (0.784). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.022) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.522) is also within normal values, averaging (1.049).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CZR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CZR’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
INSE's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for INSE turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where INSE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on INSE as a result. In 67 of 88 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
INSE moved above its 50-day moving average on November 10, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +25.68% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where INSE advanced for three days, in 220 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where INSE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
INSE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for INSE entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 7 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: INSE's P/B Ratio (-6.252) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.369). P/E Ratio (-11.562) is within average values for comparable stocks, (1.457). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.476). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.508) is also within normal values, averaging (1.692).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. INSE’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. INSE’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 98, placing this stock worse than average.
CZR | INSE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSE's Valuation (7) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZR (41) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZR’s over the last 12 months.
INSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as CZR (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.
CZR's SMR Rating (94) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as INSE (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.
CZR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as INSE (64) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.
CZR's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INSE (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew somewhat faster than INSE’s over the last 12 months.
| CZR | INSE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 80% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while INSE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- INSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CZR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CZR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CZR (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while INSE (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +23.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -5.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
CZR is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2027.
INSE is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.61% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
@Casinos/Gaming (-5.30% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
Advertisement
CZR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZR | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| INSE - CZR | 63% Loosely correlated | +16.98% | ||
| ACEL - CZR | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| DKNG - CZR | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| CHDN - CZR | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.23% | ||
| BRSL - CZR | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.20% | ||
More | ||||
INSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSE has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INSE jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSE | 100% | +16.98% | ||
| CZR - INSE | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| VAC - INSE | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| BYD - INSE | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PENN - INSE | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MGM - INSE | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFAR | 26.28 | N/A | N/A |
| DFA Real Estate Securities Portfolio: ETF Class Shares (DFAR) | |||
| AELV | 26.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (AELV) | |||
| CPNS | 28.21 | -0.07 | -0.24% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) | |||
| JSML | 88.40 | -0.23 | -0.25% |
| Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) | |||
| ERH | 10.95 | -0.08 | -0.73% |
| Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | |||