CZWI
Price
$14.16
Change
-$0.32 (-2.21%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
127.47M
53 days until earnings call
HWBK
Price
$29.17
Change
+$0.07 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
147.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZWI vs HWBK

Header iconCZWI vs HWBK Comparison
Open Charts CZWI vs HWBKBanner chart's image
Citizens Community Ban
Price$14.16
Change-$0.32 (-2.21%)
Volume$22.69K
Capitalization127.47M
Hawthorn Bancshares
Price$29.17
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
Volume$7.88K
Capitalization147.36M
CZWI vs HWBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZWI vs. HWBK commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZWI is a StrongBuy and HWBK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CZWI: $14.16 vs. HWBK: $29.17)
Brand notoriety: CZWI and HWBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZWI: 111% vs. HWBK: 59%
Market capitalization -- CZWI: $127.47M vs. HWBK: $147.36M
CZWI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $127.47M. HWBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $147.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZWI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHWBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZWI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HWBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the long-term than HWBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZWI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZWI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HWBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWBK is a better buy in the short-term than CZWI.

Price Growth

CZWI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while HWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

HWBK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWBK($147M) has a higher market cap than CZWI($127M). HWBK has higher P/E ratio than CZWI: HWBK (149.93) vs CZWI (9.75). HWBK YTD gains are higher at: 3.610 vs. CZWI (-11.062). CZWI has less debt than HWBK: CZWI (147M) vs HWBK (158M). CZWI has higher revenues than HWBK: CZWI (58.5M) vs HWBK (55.1M).
CZWIHWBKCZWI / HWBK
Capitalization127M147M86%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.0623.610-306%
P/E Ratio9.75149.937%
Revenue58.5M55.1M106%
Total CashN/A17.8M-
Total Debt147M158M93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZWI vs HWBK: Fundamental Ratings
CZWI
HWBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7261
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4521
SMR RATING
1..100
1917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZWI's Valuation (28) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWBK (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (19) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (56) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HWBK (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew significantly faster than HWBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZWIHWBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZWI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WVMRX11.21N/A
N/A
William Blair Mid Cap Value R6
INTIX12.68N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port S
LIRRX9.49N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value R3
PGTIX21.43N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Technology I
BSCMX17.11N/A
N/A
Brandes Small Cap Value I

CZWI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZWI has been loosely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZWI jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZWI
1D Price
Change %
CZWI100%
-2.21%
FITB - CZWI
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
FBNC - CZWI
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
UCB - CZWI
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
BUSE - CZWI
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
TCBI - CZWI
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More

HWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWBK has been loosely correlated with MBINM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HWBK jumps, then MBINM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWBK
1D Price
Change %
HWBK100%
+0.24%
MBINM - HWBK
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
UBFO - HWBK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
CZWI - HWBK
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
FSFG - HWBK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
FINW - HWBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More