BY
Price
$37.38
Change
-$0.06 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.7B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CZWI
Price
$23.10
Change
-$0.57 (-2.41%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
222.78M
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs CZWI

BY vs CZWI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. CZWI commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Buy and CZWI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2026
Stock price -- (BY: $37.38 vs. CZWI: $23.67)
Brand notoriety: BY and CZWI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 174% vs. CZWI: 144%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.7B vs. CZWI: $222.78M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.7B. CZWI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $222.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCZWI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CZWI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than CZWI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZWI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CZWI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZWI is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while CZWI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

CZWI is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.76% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($1.7B) has a higher market cap than CZWI($223M). CZWI has higher P/E ratio than BY: CZWI (14.46) vs BY (11.52). CZWI YTD gains are higher at: 34.231 vs. BY (29.189). CZWI has less debt than BY: CZWI (51.8M) vs BY (580M). BY has higher revenues than CZWI: BY (450M) vs CZWI (64.2M).
BYCZWIBY / CZWI
Capitalization1.7B223M761%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.18934.23185%
P/E Ratio11.5214.4680%
Revenue450M64.2M701%
Total Cash60.2MN/A-
Total Debt580M51.8M1,120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs CZWI: Fundamental Ratings
BY
CZWI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4339
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3334
SMR RATING
1..100
4274
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (71) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (34) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZWI (74) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CZWI’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BY (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

CZWI's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BY (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZWI’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYCZWI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CZWI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PYT23.670.45
+1.92%
Merrill Lynch Depositor PPLUS Floating Rate Call TR Cert Ser GSC-2(Goldman Sachs)
EGUS58.440.90
+1.56%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
BNOV48.040.31
+0.65%
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
SPLB22.25-0.01
-0.04%
State Street SPDR Port L/T Corp Bd ETF
RDWU8.49-0.01
-0.12%
T-REX 2X LONG RDW DAILY TARGET ETF

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
-0.16%
FMBH - BY
87%
Closely correlated
N/A
IBCP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
GABC - BY
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
SRCE - BY
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
UVSP - BY
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
More