It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DALN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DALN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DALN (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +11.63% price change this week, while LEE (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.48%.
DALN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.
LEE is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
DALN | LEE | DALN / LEE | |
Capitalization | 20.4M | 79.9M | 26% |
EBITDA | -6.55M | 67.4M | -10% |
Gain YTD | 40.413 | 112.834 | 36% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 10.64 | - |
Revenue | 140M | 662M | 21% |
Total Cash | 22.5M | 15.4M | 146% |
Total Debt | 16.9M | 496M | 3% |
DALN | LEE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DALN's Valuation (10) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEE (73). This means that DALN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEE’s over the last 12 months.
DALN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as LEE (100). This means that DALN’s stock grew similarly to LEE’s over the last 12 months.
LEE's SMR Rating (99) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as DALN (100). This means that LEE’s stock grew similarly to DALN’s over the last 12 months.
LEE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is in the same range as DALN (38). This means that LEE’s stock grew similarly to DALN’s over the last 12 months.
LEE's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Publishing Newspapers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DALN (91). This means that LEE’s stock grew somewhat faster than DALN’s over the last 12 months.
DALN | LEE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago69% | 6 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DALN and RELX have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DALN and RELX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DALN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DALN | 100% | +2.86% | ||
RELX - DALN | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
IFPJF - DALN | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IFJPY - DALN | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LEE - DALN | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.04% | ||
GCI - DALN | 5% Poorly correlated | +4.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEE and RELX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEE and RELX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LEE | 100% | +4.04% | ||
RELX - LEE | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
DALN - LEE | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
WLY - LEE | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
WLYB - LEE | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SCHL - LEE | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More |