LEE saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 16, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 35 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 32 of the 35 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LEE as a result. In 81 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The 50-day moving average for LEE moved below the 200-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LEE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator for LEE entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where LEE's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 35 of 40 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +3.26% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LEE advanced for three days, in 172 of 226 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
LEE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. LEE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: LEE's P/B Ratio (25.189) is slightly higher than the industry average of (8.315). P/E Ratio (10.638) is within average values for comparable stocks, (20.593). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.150) is also within normal values, averaging (5.351). LEE has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.019). P/S Ratio (0.171) is also within normal values, averaging (1.204).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LEE’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where TNMG declined for three days, in 156 of 168 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on TNMG as a result. In 36 of 71 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
The 10-day moving average for TNMG crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 6 of 9 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 11 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TNMG just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where TNMG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 15 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 31%.
Following a +17.53% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TNMG advanced for three days, in 56 of 97 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TNMG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 70 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: TNMG's P/B Ratio (29.070) is slightly higher than the industry average of (8.315). TNMG has a moderately low P/E Ratio (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (20.593). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (5.351). TNMG has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.019). P/S Ratio (0.014) is also within normal values, averaging (1.204).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TNMG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
LEE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LEE | TNMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 31% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 16 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TNMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNMG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEE (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а -15.64% price change this week, while TNMG (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was -16.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was -2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.48%.
LEE is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USIN | 47.57 | 0.04 | +0.09% |
| WisdomTree 7-10 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USIN) | |||
| CGSD | 25.40 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) | |||
| TAXM | 48.00 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Bondbloxx Ir+M Tax-Aware ETF For Massachusetts Residents | |||
| RJDI | 29.13 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| RJ Eagle GCM Dividend Select Income ETF (RJDI) | |||
| ICOP | 51.73 | -0.25 | -0.49% |
| iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEE and RELX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEE and RELX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE | 100% | -4.61% | ||
| RELX - LEE | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.67% | ||
| EDUC - LEE | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.59% | ||
| PSO - LEE | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.13% | ||
| NYT - LEE | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| TDAY - LEE | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that TNMG and EDUC have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNMG and EDUC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNMG | 100% | -3.08% | ||
| EDUC - TNMG | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.59% | ||
| LEE - TNMG | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.61% | ||
| WLYB - TNMG | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| NYT - TNMG | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| SCHL - TNMG | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
More | ||||