DAPP vs MARA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAPP is a Hold and MARA is a Hold.
MARA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DAPP | MARA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EBIZ | 25.88 | 0.50 | +1.97% |
| Global X E-commerce ETF | |||
| BUYZ | 33.15 | 0.51 | +1.58% |
| Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | |||
| PMAR | 38.80 | 0.52 | +1.36% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Mar | |||
| IBDR | 24.06 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF | |||
| RCS | 5.50 | -0.22 | -3.85% |
| PIMCO STRATEGIC Income FUND | |||
DAPP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAPP has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DAPP jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAPP | 100% | +6.53% | ||
| RIOT - DAPP | 90% Closely correlated | +3.98% | ||
| MARA - DAPP | 88% Closely correlated | +6.56% | ||
| HUT - DAPP | 88% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| CLSK - DAPP | 87% Closely correlated | +5.19% | ||
| HIVE - DAPP | 86% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
More | ||||
MARA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARA has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MARA jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | 100% | +6.56% | ||
| CLSK - MARA | 84% Closely correlated | +5.19% | ||
| RIOT - MARA | 82% Closely correlated | +3.98% | ||
| BITF - MARA | 75% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
| HIVE - MARA | 74% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| COIN - MARA | 74% Closely correlated | +3.47% | ||
More | ||||