DB
Price
$36.26
Change
+$0.64 (+1.80%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
66.89B
80 days until earnings call
SUPV
Price
$10.95
Change
-$0.31 (-2.75%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
991.14M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DB vs SUPV

Header iconDB vs SUPV Comparison
Open Charts DB vs SUPVBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Price$36.26
Change+$0.64 (+1.80%)
Volume$2.78M
Capitalization66.89B
Grupo Supervielle SA
Price$10.95
Change-$0.31 (-2.75%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization991.14M
DB vs SUPV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUPV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DB vs. SUPV commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DB is a StrongBuy and SUPV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (DB: $36.26 vs. SUPV: $10.95)
Brand notoriety: DB: Notable vs. SUPV: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DB: 99% vs. SUPV: 90%
Market capitalization -- DB: $66.89B vs. SUPV: $991.14M
DB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $66.89B. SUPV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $991.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSUPV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SUPV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the long-term than SUPV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUPV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SUPV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DB is a better buy in the short-term than SUPV.

Price Growth

DB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.47% price change this week, while SUPV (@Regional Banks) price change was +10.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

DB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SUPV is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DB($66.9B) has a higher market cap than SUPV($991M). SUPV has higher P/E ratio than DB: SUPV (31.69) vs DB (12.71). DB YTD gains are higher at: 112.669 vs. SUPV (-26.582). DB has less debt than SUPV: DB (132B) vs SUPV (231B). SUPV has higher revenues than DB: SUPV (1T) vs DB (31B).
DBSUPVDB / SUPV
Capitalization66.9B991M6,751%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD112.669-26.582-424%
P/E Ratio12.7131.6940%
Revenue31B1T3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt132B231B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DB vs SUPV: Fundamental Ratings
DB
SUPV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
379
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1046
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DB's Valuation (59) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (87). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUPV (46). This means that DB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (4). This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

DB's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (53). This means that DB’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as DB (14). This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to DB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBSUPV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUPV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMAT51.200.38
+0.76%
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
BGDV25.620.07
+0.26%
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
IYLD20.690.01
+0.05%
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Inc ETF
BSCS20.52-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corp Bd ETF
DGIN40.37-0.56
-1.36%
VanEck Digital India ETF

SUPV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPV has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUPV jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUPV
1D Price
Change %
SUPV100%
-2.75%
BMA - SUPV
91%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
BBAR - SUPV
90%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
GGAL - SUPV
89%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
BAP - SUPV
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
DB - SUPV
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
More