| DBEM | EMXC | DBEM / EMXC | |
| Gain YTD | 28.163 | 38.475 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 103M | 25.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.25 | 264% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 15.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 2.04 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| DBEM | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 25 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TEMD | 25.12 | N/A | N/A |
| Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF | |||
| IBIC | 26.09 | N/A | -0.02% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term Tips ETF | |||
| IBMR | 25.36 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| IMTM | 52.32 | -0.72 | -1.36% |
| iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | |||
| AMDG | 112.64 | -5.69 | -4.81% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DBEM has been loosely correlated with KC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DBEM jumps, then KC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBEM | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| KC - DBEM | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| JD - DBEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| BILI - DBEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| BIDU - DBEM | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| BZUN - DBEM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -1.53% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| XP - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.60% | ||
| Q - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.55% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||