DBLVF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
95.47M
DCNNF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DBLVF vs DCNNF

Header iconDBLVF vs DCNNF Comparison
Open Charts DBLVF vs DCNNFBanner chart's image
Doubleview Gold
Price$0.44
Change-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization95.47M
QUEST CRITICAL METALS
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$29.3K
Capitalization1.7M
DBLVF vs DCNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DBLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DBLVF vs. DCNNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBLVF is a Hold and DCNNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DBLVF: $0.44 vs. DCNNF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: DBLVF and DCNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DBLVF: 2% vs. DCNNF: 48%
Market capitalization -- DBLVF: $95.47M vs. DCNNF: $1.7M
DBLVF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $95.47M. DCNNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DBLVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDCNNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DBLVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DCNNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBLVF is a better buy in the long-term than DCNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DBLVF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCNNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DBLVF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DCNNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBLVF is a better buy in the short-term than DCNNF.

Price Growth

DBLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while DCNNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBLVF($95.5M) has a higher market cap than DCNNF($1.7M). DBLVF YTD gains are higher at: 72.763 vs. DCNNF (-38.176). DCNNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -469.51K vs. DBLVF (-2.84M). DBLVF has more cash in the bank: 4.22M vs. DCNNF (88.9K). DBLVF (0) and DCNNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DBLVFDCNNFDBLVF / DCNNF
Capitalization95.5M1.7M5,604%
EBITDA-2.84M-469.51K605%
Gain YTD72.763-38.176-191%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.22M88.9K4,746%
Total DebtN/A400K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DBLVF vs DCNNF: Fundamental Ratings
DBLVF
DCNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2551
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4195
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBLVF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (65). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCNNF (95). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DBLVFDCNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DBLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTS4.390.52
+13.57%
ALT5 Sigma Corporation
SBLK19.310.20
+1.05%
Star Bulk Carriers Corp
JZ1.54N/A
N/A
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited
NDSN225.03-0.98
-0.43%
Nordson Corp
FATN5.86-0.29
-4.72%
FatPipe Inc.

DBLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBLVF and PBMLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBLVF and PBMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBLVF
1D Price
Change %
DBLVF100%
-6.36%
PBMLF - DBLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
CXOXF - DBLVF
9%
Poorly correlated
-8.85%
DCNNF - DBLVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+23.08%
CTXDF - DBLVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
DAUGF - DBLVF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DCNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCNNF and LTRBF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCNNF and LTRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCNNF
1D Price
Change %
DCNNF100%
+23.08%
LTRBF - DCNNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - DCNNF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
BHSIF - DCNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.29%
FPRGF - DCNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
YORKF - DCNNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More