Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
Price$23.13
Change-$0.17 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.46
Change-$0.29 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. DBMCX (1.06B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (16 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). DBMCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.92 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX (17.00) and DBMCX (16.62) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.33 vs. DBMCX (-16.40).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.04 | 5,114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.04 | 5,257% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | 6.459 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 39.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.62 | 17.00 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.21 | 34.94 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.40 | 53.33 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.21 | 85.49 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement