Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. DBMCX (822M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. DBMCX (-34.79). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. DBMCX (-51.80).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.310 | 15.913 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 822M | 43.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.79 | 24.38 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.79 | 63.28 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.80 | 39.12 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.66 | 139.20 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers