Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DBMCX (784M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. DBMCX (-36.51). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. DBMCX (-52.73).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.408 | 16.937 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 784M | 40.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -36.51 | 23.68 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.96 | 72.74 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -52.73 | 40.14 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.63 | 134.49 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement