Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. DBMCX (797M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. DBMCX (-35.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. DBMCX (-53.01).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.464 | 13.668 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 797M | 42.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -35.27 | 30.51 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.20 | 71.53 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -53.01 | 37.00 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.03 | 141.36 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers