Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMCX vs FSMAX
DBMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DBMCX (715M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs DBMCX (0.00). DBMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMCX (17 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMCX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. DBMCX (-44.12). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.57 vs. DBMCX (-58.45).
| DBMCX | FSMAX | DBMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.04 | 5,314% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.414 | 13.490 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 715M | 40.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -44.12 | 12.03 | -367% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.52 | 66.71 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.45 | 32.57 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.85 | 131.27 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement