DBMG vs HOCFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMG is a Hold and HOCFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DBMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOCFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DBMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HOCFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DBMG’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOCFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DBMG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HOCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DBMG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HOCFF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.06%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+4.42% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| DBMG | HOCFF | DBMG / HOCFF | |
| Capitalization | 132M | 10.5B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 27.2M | 1.76B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 3.247 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 14.16 | - |
| Revenue | 416M | 31B | 1% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 5.53B | - |
| Total Debt | 5.91M | 789M | 1% |
DBMG | HOCFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DBMG's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as HOCFF (30). This means that DBMG’s stock grew similarly to HOCFF’s over the last 12 months.
HOCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMG (100). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew similarly to DBMG’s over the last 12 months.
HOCFF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBMG (61). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBMG’s over the last 12 months.
HOCFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBMG (76). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBMG’s over the last 12 months.
HOCFF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBMG (100). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBMG’s over the last 12 months.
| DBMG | HOCFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 41% | 12 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 25% | 12 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 18% | 12 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 22% | 12 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 38% |
DBMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMG and KAJMF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMG and KAJMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DBMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBMG | 100% | N/A | ||
| KAJMF - DBMG | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESOA - DBMG | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| HOCFF - DBMG | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IMPJY - DBMG | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JGCCF - DBMG | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HOCFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HOCFF and AGFY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOCFF and AGFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOCFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOCFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AGFY - HOCFF | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ACSAY - HOCFF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| EFGSY - HOCFF | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| EFGSF - HOCFF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESOA - HOCFF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||