Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMZX vs FSMAX
DBMZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMZX vs FSMAX
DBMZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMZX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. DBMZX (778M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DBMZX (0.00). DBMZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMZX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMZX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMZX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. DBMZX (-25.07). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. DBMZX (-42.48).
| DBMZX | FSMAX | DBMZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.048 | 13.370 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 778M | 40.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.07 | 20.57 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.08 | 55.83 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.48 | 33.18 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 229.78 | 133.82 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement