Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMZX vs FSMAX
DBMZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMZX vs FSMAX
DBMZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. DBMZX (822M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMZX: FSMAX (0.48) vs DBMZX (0.00). DBMZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMZX (8 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMZX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMZX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. DBMZX (-21.42). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. DBMZX (-38.16).
| DBMZX | FSMAX | DBMZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.921 | 15.913 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 822M | 43.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.42 | 24.38 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.54 | 63.28 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.16 | 39.12 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 243.56 | 139.20 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers