Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DBMZX vs FSMAX
DBMZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts DBMZX vs FSMAX
DBMZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DBMZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBMZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. DBMZX (843M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than DBMZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs DBMZX (0.00). DBMZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: DBMZX (8 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). DBMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). DBMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.25 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBMZX: FSMAX (0) vs DBMZX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. DBMZX (-19.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. DBMZX (-39.98).
| DBMZX | FSMAX | DBMZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.968 | 15.427 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 42.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.05 | 29.23 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.67 | 73.83 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.98 | 33.65 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 263.09 | 153.47 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers